Taming Queen developments

It’s fun to see your own community on TV. However, a March 15 segment on Global News about the glass condo blitz on Queen in the Beach was sad to watch (tinyurl.com/6p54fjw).

It covered the problems associated with development, such as increased street parking, traffic congestion and TTC short-turns. Local historian Gene Domagala described how the history of the Beach has shaped a unique neighbourhood, whose character is now at risk. Mitchell Kosney, Professor of Urban Planning at Ryerson, said “development is a privilege, not a right,” and that “developers need to establish a reciprocal relationship with the community.”

That same evening, 150 residents attended a community meeting organized by Friends of Queen Street, a residents’ group. They were concerned that the rezoning of one property at a time along Queen will result in the domino destruction of the character of the street. They wanted to know whether this type of development is unavoidable.

Some development advocates insist that intensification is inevitable and is mandated in Ontario’s Places to Grow Act, to avoid urban sprawl. The fact is that we are well ahead of the province’s targets for intensification. The Ontario Ministry of Finance’s Historical and Projected Ontario Population by Census Report for 2010-2036 shows that Toronto has already met 80 per cent of its target for 2031. And with so many new homes being built, there is now one new unit being constructed for every 1.4 new residents! Toronto is well ahead of the curve.

Toronto’s Official Plan clearly states that there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ and that many communities, such as ours, are already zoned just right.

The Official Plan says that “not all lands that fall within Avenues are designated for growth.” Densification makes sense for arterial roads where there are few buildings except strip malls, and where major streets can easily handle more transit and cars. Queen Street East is not an arterial road at all and is already very congested.

Toronto’s Official Plan and the Avenues and Midrise Buildings study both concede that some avenues that are ‘main streets’ already have appropriate zoning: “These stable communities have a sizeable residential base that supports local shopping such as grocery stores, drug stores, banks etc. They already have zoning in place to guide development in a way that fits with the neighbourhood.”

Queen Street East is specifically listed as one such stable main street that is to be developed through infill, as per existing zoning. Our Queen Street is also designated by City Bylaw No. 1118-2008 as a ‘Potential Heritage Conservation District’. According to Official Plan Amendment No. 38, the desired outcome for this designation is “conservation of the character,” and “infill development that is sensitive to the character of the area.”

In July 2010, Council approved a motion to remove Queen Street from the Avenues study “because of the heritage nature of many parts of Queen Street and this as-of-right nature of the buildings.” The heritage commentary indicates Council’s intent to maintain the low-rise nature of the street.

Many are not aware that there are currently Beach Urban Design Guidelines that stipulate the design elements that give Queen Street its special character.

The City has confirmed that these guidelines are still in effect. They have been used until now for many attractive modern developments along Queen Street. Yet each time the Friends of Queen Street have raised this issue, the city has said that the Guidelines now carry little weight because they are “just” guidelines and they are “outdated.”

A planned Visioning Study, which is intended to update the Guidelines, is certainly a good idea. Unfortunately, it will not be completed until November. By that time, so many rezoning applications will have been filed that the Queen Street we are trying to save may no longer exist.

That is why a recent petition by 400 residents asks that until the new Guidelines are in place, the existing Beach Urban Design Guidelines should be upheld.

Developers point to 2012 Queen Street, across from Kew Gardens, as a positive precedent for the kind of 6-storey condos that are being proposed. With deep step-back levels that begin as low as the third floor, this 16.5 metre building blends into the streetscape and does not constitute a precedent to allow taller (20 metre or more), modernistic, un-environmental glass structures, with minimal step-backs, and vast windowless, side walls.

One of the Avenue Study requirements is that a complete re-zoning application must be accompanied by an Avenue Segment Study with proper public consultation as well as traffic studies, shadow studies, infrastructure studies and so on. We have had none of this.

Most Beachers recognize the need to develop and revitalize the street. We are not opposed to change nor to heights that are in keeping with the context of the street. However, with eight identified sites from Woodbine to Lee that are either in development or with potential for development, we have questions about traffic, parking, transit, sewerage, shading, inappropriate transitions, unattractive blank side walls and loss of character. We feel that existing rules are not being upheld that would address these very issues and help to preserve the character of Queen Street.

Simone Skopek is a member of Friends of Queen Street. They are online at friendsofqueenstreet.wordpress.com.

Was this article informative? Become a Beach Metro Community News Supporter today! For 50 years, we have worked hard to be the eyes and ears in your community, inform you of upcoming events, and let you know what and who is making a difference. We cover the big stories as well as the little things that often matter the most. CLICK HERE to support your Beach Metro Community News!


Well written Simone. Thank you for all the great work you are doing to make people aware of the development issues in the Beach. Let us hope that city councilors and planners, developers and the OMB start to listen and take note of residents concerns about appropriate development for Queen Street and the neighbourhood. Sharman Wilson, Member Friends of Queen Street

Every condo project is advertised with retail , no food shops, on the bottom and private cabana parties on the top. This does not help our neighbourhood.

Despite 6 projects surrounding a large elementary school, all of the condos are geared for singles. With little for singles to do here, the TDSB must plan to bring night school courses to Kew Beach School. Surely the TDSB will accommodate the neighbourhood, since they may want to sell off the school play ground for condos. Short term gain for long term obesity rates in children. No planning at all.

“Friends of Queen Street” my A…! Nothing but MIMBYs who are anti-development no matter what shape it takes. The fact is, these condos will be welcome additions to the Queen Street landscape and are supported by the silent majority of the Beach comminity.

Mr McNulty

Ironically I agree with 90 percent of what you say however you are misunderstanding the issue No one is opposed to new development, in fact it is encouraged. Thie issue is in what context and the vast majority of residents we speak to aren’t comfortable with double the current height and density. The references to xenophobia and NIMBY aren’t not warranted and disrespectful. What is stopping any citizen from buying a home today ? We just want to ensure that new development enhances and doesn’t detract from what makes the Beach such a pleasant place to live. In terms of new business, please note that all new developments are ‘ clean’ which means no food services of ANY kind, thus no improvements in dining options. Infact, that was a key issue that we were fighting for, so that the vitality of Queen wouldnt be damaged. Aside from business owners who have expressed a clear desire to sell to developers, I have yet to hear or speak to anyone that we couldn’t come to an agreement with once they better understood the issues. To that end I strongly encourage you to get involved in the Visioning study with an open mind. The residents groups have pushed our councillor to do this study so that we can all ensure that our neighbourhood is better after the development in terms of traffic, parking, transit, air quality and vitality of businesses on Queen. If you have an open mind you will see that all residents have not been served well by the city in ensuring rules and processes are followed.


Jason Self

Click here for our commenting guidelines.

Leave a Reply